A Quantitative Study on the Impact of National Demographic Characteristics on Cybercrime Distribution Based on Spearman and XGBoost Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/bzjdha11Keywords:
Cybercrime distribution; National characteristics; XGBoost model.Abstract
This study focuses on quantitatively analyzing the relationship between national demographic characteristics and the distribution of cybercrime, aiming to identify the most influential macro-factors. The research first employed Spearman's rank correlation analysis to assess the linear correlations between twelve national indicators—encompassing economic, social, educational, and internet usage metrics—and the cybercrime factor. The results revealed strong linear correlations for GDP per capita, GDP, aging rate, and three internet-related data points. Subsequently, to incorporate both linear and non-linear relationships, this study utilized the XGBoost machine learning model for in-depth analysis.Feature importance analysis from the XGBoost model indicated that GDP per capita is the most influential national characteristic affecting cybercrime distribution, with a correlation coefficient of 0.24633. The number of secure internet servers and GDP were also identified as high-impact indicators. The findings suggest that while regions with high GDP per capita host active online financial activities and advanced technology—potentially offering more criminal opportunities—overall, economically developed areas may exhibit lower rates of cybercrime incidence. In contrast, the unemployment rate demonstrated the lowest impact, with a coefficient of only 0.01276. The model achieved a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.339 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.744, demonstrating strong explanatory power and predictive accuracy regarding the factors influencing cybercrime distribution.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang Di. The Logic and Direction of Judicial Governance Regarding the Difficulties in Proving Cybercrimes: An Examination of Judicial Interpretations and Normative Documents from 2004 to 2024[J]. Peking University Law Journal, 2025, 37(3): 605-624.
[2] Cao Jie. Revisiting the Theory of Restricted Accessoriality in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities[J]. Journal of Yibin University, 2025, 25(5): 49-59.
[3] Li Xiaolu. The "Production Order" Clause in the UN Convention on Cybercrime and Its Domestic Legal Response[J]. Evidence Science, 2025, 33(3): 307-319.
[4] Hu Zongjin. A Systematic Examination of the Principal Offender Status of Aiding Behaviors in the Realm of Cybercrime[J]. Jingchu Law Review, 2025(3): 39-49
[5] Xu Yang, Yang Yuan. A Study on the Legalization of Collaborative Governance of Cybercrime[J]. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 49(3): 35-42.
[6] Dong Yuelin. A Review of Cybercrime Research in China over the Past Five Years[J]. Journal of Shanxi Police College, 2025, 33(2): 104-112.
[7] Zhang Yafei, Li Wenjing. On the Re-identification and Judicial Application of the Types of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities[J]. Journal of Kashgar University, 2025, 46(2): 28-36.
[8] Xie Dengke. Personal Information Protection in Cross-Border Electronic Data Acquisition: From the Perspective of Article 36 of the UN Convention on Cybercrime[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (Tribune of Law), 2025, 40(3): 63-79.
[9] Li Xiang, Cao Jiyuan. Development Trends, Generative Mechanisms, and Governance Strategies of Cybercrime in the Web3.0 Era[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police College, 2025, 37(3): 89-99.
[10] Lao Dongyan. The Protected Legal Interest of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities[J]. Legal Forum, 2025, 40(2): 5-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








