A Study on Optimal NIPT Timing Selection and Intelligent Fetal Abnormality Dectection Based on Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/tc4t0p50Keywords:
XG-Boost regression; nonlinear optimization; random forest classification; K-means clustering; fetal abnormality detection.Abstract
To address the challenges of uncertain testing time points and the difficulty in determining abnormalities due to individual variations in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), this paper introduces an integrated machine learning framework that amalgamates prediction, optimization, and classification. The framework is designed to identify key factors influencing the quality of testing data and, based on these factors, to offer personalized optimal testing time points and highly accurate solutions for abnormality determination. Initially, the study utilizes an XG-Boost regression model to elucidate the complex nonlinear relationships among critical quality control indicators and factors such as gestational age at testing and maternal BMI. Building upon this, a novel approach that integrates weighted K-means clustering with nonlinear programming is employed to ascertain the optimal testing window for groups of pregnant women with varying physiological characteristics. Finally, to address the challenge of classifying rare abnormal samples, an adaptively weighted and optimized random forest model is developed. Experimental results indicate that this framework effectively handles the data nonlinearity and individual heterogeneity. The final classification model achieves a high recall rate of 85% and a precision of 97%, underscoring the advanced nature of the proposed method and its potential for clinical application.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhou, C. X., He, L. L., Zhu, X. Y., Li, Z. X., Duan, H. L., Liu, W., Gu, L. L., & Li, J. (2023b). [Report content and prenatal diagnosis of non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidy]. PubMed, 58 (10), 766–773.
[2] Qiongzhen Z, JiaNaGuLi H, Shanshan D. The influence of fetal gender and maternal characteristics on fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma [J]. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2019, 48 (8): 653-656.
[3] Stevens C, Llorin H, Gabriel C, et al. Genetic counseling for fetal sex prediction by NIPT: Challenges and opportunities [J]. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2023, 32 (5): 945-956.
[4] Binson V A, Thomas S, Subramoniam M, et al. A review of machine learning algorithms for biomedical applications [J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2024, 52 (5): 1159-1183.
[5] Gao, L., Feng, J., Gao, Y., Luo, L., Jiang, H., Yang, Q., Lu, J., & Guo, L. (2025). XGBoost-based model for predicting PICC occlusion risk in cancer patients: Insights from SHAP analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 123, 436–447.
[6] Mim S S, Logofatu D, Leon F. Efficient Analysis of Patient Length of Stay in Hospitals Using Classification and Clustering Approaches [C] // International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023: 675-688.
[7] Ugolkov Y, Nikitich A, Leon C, et al. Mathematical modeling in autoimmune diseases: from theory to clinical application [J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 2024, 15: 1371620.
[8] Li J, Ju J, Zhao Q, et al. Effective identification of maternal malignancies in pregnancies undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing [J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2022, 13: 802865.
[9] Chen M, Jiang F, Guo Y, et al. Validation of fetal DNA fraction estimation and its application in noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy detection in multiple pregnancies [J]. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2019, 39 (13): 1273-1282.
[10] Liehr T. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results are less accurate the later applied during pregnancy [J]. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 63 (6): 892-895.
[11] Chen Y, Yang F, Shang X, et al. A study on non-invasive prenatal screening for the detection of aneuploidy [J]. Ginekologia Polska, 2022, 93 (9): 716-720.
[12] Liu S, Chang Q, Yang F, et al. Non-invasive prenatal test findings in 41,819 pregnant women: results from a clinical laboratory in southern China [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 (3): 787-795.
[13] Zheng J, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Clinical Data based XGBoost Algorithm for infection risk prediction of patients with decompensated cirrhosis: A 10-year (2012–2021) Multicenter Retrospective Case-control study [J]. BMC gastroenterology, 2023, 23 (1): 310.
[14] Gupta R, Bhandari M, Grover A, et al. Correction: Predictive modeling of ALS progression: an XGBoost approach using clinical features [J]. BioData Mining, 2025, 18: 5.
[15] Zhu M, Xia J, Jin X, et al. Class weights random forest algorithm for processing class imbalanced medical data [J]. IEEE access, 2018, 6: 4641-4652.
[16] Salehpour A, Norouzi M, Balafar M A, et al. A cloud‐based hybrid intrusion detection framework using XGBoost and ADASYN‐Augmented random forest for IoMT [J]. IET Communications, 2024, 18 (19): 1371-1390.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








