A Physical–Economic Coupling Modeling and Weighted Bi-Objective Optimization Framework for Large-Scale Transportation Systems

Authors

  • Shaobo Xiang Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/rd3b3f92

Keywords:

Physical–Economic Coupling Model; Multi-Objective Programming; Multi-Stage Resource Allocation.

Abstract

This paper constructs a physical-economic coupling model integrating space elevators with traditional rockets for multi-billion-ton Earth-Moon material transport missions. Within a unified framework, it delineates the intrinsic relationships among transport capacity, time cycles, and economic costs. Based on dynamic analysis and energy consumption calculations, a dual-objective planning model targeting total project duration and total cost is established by incorporating unit cost functions and annual transport capacity constraints. A time-cost Pareto frontier is constructed using a weighted summation method. The model achieves multi-year optimized resource allocation through capacity constraints and cumulative demand conditions. It also designs a dynamic allocation mechanism prioritizing full elevator utilization with flexible rocket compensation, enabling synergy between low-cost baseline transport capacity and high-mobility acceleration capabilities. Results demonstrate that this method systematically reveals economies of scale and marginal cost differences across transport architectures, forming a continuously adjustable time-cost tradeoff range. This provides a universally applicable optimization framework and theoretical foundation for comprehensive decision-making in large-scale deep-space engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang Liping, Ren Yu, Qiu Qicang, et al. Research Review on Performance Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Computer Science, 2021, 44 (08): 1590-1619.

[2] Li Yongyi, Wang Zihan, Zhang Lei, et al. Capacity Allocation Optimization for Integrated Wind-Solar-Hydrogen-Gas Turbine Hydrogen-Electric Coupling Systems [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 2025, 45 (02): 489-502. DOI: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.232133.

[3] Jiang Meng, Huang Yu, Liao Weihan, et al. Multi-Objective Optimization of Integrated Electricity-Gas-Heat Energy Systems Based on an Improved NSGA-II Algorithm [J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41 (02): 131-136.

[4] Xing Yuhua, Ren Tiantian. Application Research of Improved MOPSO in Microgrid Optimization Dispatch [J]. Journal of Solar Energy, 2024, 45(06): 191-200. DOI:10.19912/j.0254-0096.t. [J]. Journal of Solar Energy, 2024, 45(06): 191-200. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0197.

[5] Huang Jingjie, Li Jincheng, Liu Keming, et al. Multi-Objective Capacity Optimization of Photovoltaic-Storage Charging Stations Incorporating CVaR and Augmented ε-Constraint Method [J]. Southern Power Grid Technology, 2023, 17 (10): 94-103. DOI: 10.13648/j.cnki.issn1674-0629.2023.10.010.

[6] Niu Fuqiang, Zhang Guofu, Su Zhaopin, et al. Multi-stage Multi-objective Dynamic Testing Resource Allocation Algorithm [J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2020, 41 (03): 656-663. DOI: 10.16208/j.issn1000-7024.2020.03.010.

Downloads

Published

09-04-2026

How to Cite

Xiang, S. (2026). A Physical–Economic Coupling Modeling and Weighted Bi-Objective Optimization Framework for Large-Scale Transportation Systems. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 12, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.62051/rd3b3f92